Independent reference. No vendor affiliation. Reprinted scores dated to their source; elsewhere we link the official board. Editorial policy.
Abstract
WhatOrder-of-magnitude dollar cost to run 12 popular agent benchmarks, single pass-1 run, Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Pricing sourceAnthropic list pricing: $3 / $15 per million input / output tokens.
Reasoning modeAssumed on; disabling it lowers cost (and usually accuracy).
Anthropic pricinganthropic.com/pricing
Section IV.vii Methodology|Reviewed 2026

Agent Eval Cost Calculator: Estimate $ to Run SWE-bench, GAIA, TauBench

Order-of-magnitude estimates of what each benchmark costs to run end-to-end at frontier-model pricing.

I

Reference Cost Table

Estimates assume a single pass-1 run with reasoning mode enabled, priced on Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $3 per million input and $15 per million output tokens (Anthropic list pricing). The dollar figures are computed directly from the token columns and that pricing, so they are only as good as the approximate token counts — treat them as order-of-magnitude, not as a quote. To price a different model, run the DIY formula below with its published rates.

Benchmark
Tasks
Avg in tok
Avg out tok
Sonnet 4.6 (est.)
HumanEval
164
1,500
500
$1.97
MMLU-Pro
12032
1,200
400
$116
MATH-500
500
1,000
4,000
$32
GPQA-Diamond
198
1,200
6,000
$19
SWE-bench Verified
500
90,000
20,000
$285
GAIA
466
25,000
8,000
$91
WebArena
812
60,000
15,000
$329
Tau-Bench Retail (pass^1)
115
18,000
6,000
$17
Tau-Bench Airline (pass^1)
50
22,000
7,000
$9
BFCL v3 (all categories)
2000
3,500
800
$45
AssistantBench
214
30,000
7,000
$42
AppWorld
750
28,000
9,000
$164
II

DIY Formula

For your own model and benchmark estimate, the formula is straightforward. Cost equals tasks times average input tokens times input price per million plus tasks times average output tokens times output price per million, all divided by one million. Pass^k or pass@k runs multiply by k. Multi-seed runs multiply by the number of seeds. Best-of-N runs multiply by N at the model side then run a verifier (usually cheap) at the end.

III

Reading The Table

SWE-bench Verified, WebArena, and AppWorld dominate the cost budget for agent benchmarking because they involve large per-task context and long agent trajectories. MMLU-Pro is expensive in aggregate because it has 12,000 tasks, even though each task is cheap. GPQA-Diamond is small in task count but burns reasoning tokens on hard problems. The total cost ladder roughly tracks task count times average tokens per task, with reasoning-mode multipliers applying on reasoning-heavy benchmarks.

Cost per eval referencepass@k methodologyReproducibility considerations
Reader Questions
Q.01How are these cost estimates calculated?+
We take a rough average input and output token count per task (from public eval-run logs and the benchmark's own task descriptions) and multiply by current Anthropic list pricing for Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3 per million input, $15 per million output). The token counts are approximate and the result is an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a quote: your actuals depend on harness, retry strategy, and reasoning-mode settings, and can easily differ by a factor of 1.5 or more in either direction.
Q.02Why is SWE-bench Verified so expensive?+
Two reasons. First, the agent reads several files of repository context, often tens of thousands of tokens per task. Second, the agent commonly iterates: read, plan, edit, run tests, debug, re-edit. A single SWE-bench Verified task can run from tens of thousands to a few hundred thousand tokens. Multiply by 500 tasks and frontier-model pricing and a full run lands in the low thousands of dollars.
Q.03Are reasoning-mode tokens included?+
The estimates assume reasoning/extended-thinking is on, and those tokens bill at the output rate. Disabling thinking lowers cost materially for the same task, usually at some cost to accuracy depending on the benchmark. Because thinking-token volume varies so much by task, treat any reasoning-heavy row as the softest estimate on the page.
Q.04What is the cheapest way to run a benchmark for regression testing?+
Pick a small representative subset (10 to 25 tasks), pin a fixed seed, run greedy decoding, disable reasoning mode where applicable. This produces a cheap, reproducible signal for change detection in CI at a small fraction of a full run. Promote to a full run only when the signal moves enough to matter.
Q.05Do these numbers include API throttling or retry?+
No. Per-token cost only. Retries on transient errors typically add a few percent to total cost; rate-limit backoff adds wall-clock time but not dollar cost. The estimates also do not include any provider beyond the single Claude Sonnet 4.6 column — run the DIY formula below with your own model's published rates to price a different model.

Sources

  1. [1] Anthropic pricing: anthropic.com/pricing
  2. [2] SWE-bench leaderboard: swebench.com
  3. [3] GAIA leaderboard: huggingface.co/spaces/gaia-benchmark/leaderboard
From the editor

Benchmarking Agents Review is published by Digital Signet, an independent firm that builds and ships AI agents in production for mid-market companies. If you are evaluating, designing, or productionising LLM agents and want a working second opinion, get in touch.

Book a 30-min scoping callDigital Signet →

30 minutes, free, independent.·1-page action plan within 48h.·Honest if not the right fit.